Impostures: Postmodern Philosopher... | Intellectual

The article was published, which Sokal argued showed that the journal’s editors lacked scientific rigor and were willing to publish nonsense as long as it used the right postmodern jargon. 4. Key Takeaways

A summary of the specific regarding a particular philosopher (e.g., Lacan or Deleuze)? The counter-arguments or responses from postmodern critics? More details on the Sokal hoax article itself? EU-E-Law, Lao Tzu and Law Teachers in the CT Age - BILETA Intellectual Impostures: postmodern philosopher...

It acts as a critique of how "authority" is determined in academic and public spheres. To help you further, would you like: The article was published, which Sokal argued showed

Intellectual Impostures (published as Fashionable Nonsense in the US) is a 1998 book by physicists Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont that critiques the use of scientific concepts and terminology by several prominent French postmodernist philosophers. 1. Core Purpose and Argument The counter-arguments or responses from postmodern critics

The authors argue that postmodern philosophers often use scientific jargon to intimidate readers and add an air of authority to their work, even though the usage is mathematically or physically nonsensical.